HERITAGE From the team behind REMY Robotics

Run the portioning line without the staffing fight.

Merista is building operated robotic portioning cells for chilled prepared‑meal lines. We are selecting design‑partner factories to assess hard‑to‑fill repetitive seats, prove the ROI on one line, and validate the first production deployments.

Pre‑deployment · Selecting design partners · Q3–Q4 2026
Cell schematic · MRA‑01 ACTIVE LOOP
CYCLE TARGET
~6s / task
CHANGEOVER
<30min
FOOTPRINT
1station
Operating record SOURCE: REMY ROBOTICS · 2021–2026 · Heritage proof, attributed
10×
Robot‑run kitchens deployed across 5 cities
15,000 h
Operating hours in live production environments
<1%
Human intervention across production workflows
<15 min
Mean recovery time from a stop event
02 · The line

You know this line.

The hardest seats on the floor are the repetitive ones — and they are often the ones you cannot keep filled.

01 · LABOR

The roles you cannot staff

Three to five people per shift on repetitive portioning work, with turnover and absenteeism hitting the same seats again and again.

02 · GIVEAWAY

Giveaway eating your margin

Hand portioning often overfills to be safe. Every gram over target is product given away free, every shift, every line.

03 · REWORK

Rework and stoppages

Inconsistent portions create failed checkweighs, reworked trays, and micro‑stoppages that drag down the whole line.

04 · UTILIZATION

A line that runs at human pace

People need breaks, rotation, training, and recovery. The work is necessary — but the task itself is a poor use of human attention.

None of this is a people problem. It is the wrong work for people to be doing all day.
03 · The cell

A portioning cell for the line you already run.

Merista is building an operated robotic portioning cell for chilled prepared‑meal lines. The cell is designed to pick up an ingredient, deposit it toward a target weight, and place it onto the tray or bowl already moving through your process. The goal is to use the footprint of one worker station and connect to the line you have — not a line you need to rebuild.

Process flow · single cell · single task → direction of travel
01 · SOURCE

Ingredient hopper

Refilled on customer schedule. Stable ingredient families validated during trials.

02 · SENSE

Perception + weight

3D vision and inline weight sensing guide each portion toward the target.

03 · DEPOSIT

Food‑safe arm

Robot arm performs the deposit with food‑contact‑safe end effector.

04 · LINE

Your conveyor

Tray or bowl already moving through your existing process. No rebuild.

05 · QA
142.0 g

Inline checkweigh

Every portion validated before the tray moves on. Logged from deposit through inspection.

Cycle TARGET
~6.0sec / task
Changeover TARGET
< 30min · same SKU family
Useful uptime TARGET
97% · after maturity
Portion accuracy TARGET
> baseline · vs. manual

Design‑partner envelope

  • High‑volume chilled prepared‑meal lines.
  • Repetitive topping, dosing, or portioning tasks.
  • Stable ingredient families that can be validated during trials.
  • Lines where a clear labor, giveaway, rework, or utilization case exists.

Platform breadth · later

  • The same cell platform is intended to expand into topping and tray assembly.
  • First design‑partner work starts with one repetitive, high‑value task.
  • Expansion happens where economics and reliability make sense — not before.
  • One task, one line, one measurable payback case at a time.
We do not automate everything on the line, and we do not pretend to. We start with one repetitive task, prove it in your production context, then expand only where the economics and reliability make sense.
04 · The team

We did not demo food robots. We ran them.

At REMY Robotics, the founding team built and operated autonomous food production across Europe and the U.S. in live, customer‑facing service.

SOURCE REMY ROBOTICS OPERATING RECORD · 2021–2026 · ATTRIBUTED
01 · INTERVENTION
<1%
Human intervention in REMY production workflows.
02 · COMPLETION
99.9%
Successful order completion across deployed kitchens.
03 · RECOVERY
<15 min
Mean time to recovery from a stop event.
04 · SCALE
10 sites
Robot‑run kitchens across 5 cities, 16+ hrs / day.
05 · VOLUME
100K+
Orders served on one reused core platform.
That is the hard part of food robotics: not the demo, but the years of uptime, recovery, QA, support, and operating discipline behind it. Merista is applying that discipline to repetitive work inside food factories.
Founding
Founded by the REMY Robotics team. Vasilii Artemev, former CTO of REMY Robotics, led the engineering organization behind the autonomous kitchen platform. REMY Robotics was acquired by REEF Technology in 2026.
05 · Reliability & ops

You are not buying another machine to babysit.

A robot that becomes the floor manager's problem is not automation. Merista is being built as an operated cell — monitored remotely, supported by the team that designed it, and measured by useful production uptime inside a defined task envelope.

Your team runs the line

CUSTOMER
  • 01Line context, recipe, and SKU schedule
  • 02Ingredient sourcing and hopper refill
  • 03Production schedule and shift planning
  • 04Cleaning regime and sanitation sign‑off
  • 05Final product QA per your existing process

Merista keeps the cell healthy

OPERATED
  • 01Fleet monitoring from the first production deployment
  • 02Automated recovery flows where possible
  • 03Remote support & diagnostics when the cell needs help
  • 04Maintenance, spares planning, and software updates
  • 05Written uptime & support commitments after envelope definition
The design goal is simple: your team runs the line; Merista keeps the cell healthy.
06 · Economics

Positive on one shift. Stronger on every shift after.

The commercial model is intended to be a flat monthly subscription for the cell — including hardware, software, monitoring, and support. The subscription does not scale with every shift the same way manual labor does. That is why multi‑shift lines are the best first fit.

Shift utilization model · per cell · per month ILLUSTRATIVE
Shifts per day
Manual labor cost
28,800/ mo
3 seats × shift × loaded
Merista subscription
9,500/ mo
Flat · 24–36 mo term
Illustrative net benefit
19,300/ mo
STRONG
ILLUSTRATIVE MODEL ONLY. Final economics depend on task, staffing pattern, wage cost, line speed, product value, ingredient behavior, sanitation process, and shift utilization. Subscription pricing is built around your line during the walkthrough.
01 · LABOR

Labor pressure

Reduce dependency on hard‑to‑fill repetitive seats and absorb the seats most exposed to turnover.

02 · ACCURACY

Portion accuracy

Reduce overfill and giveaway by holding closer to target weight on every deposit.

03 · STOPPAGES

Rework & stoppages

Fewer failed checkweighs, fewer reworked trays, fewer micro‑stoppages that drag down the line.

04 · UTILIZATION

Utilization

A cell designed for repeatable production without breaks, rotation, or absenteeism.

Intended commercial model: per‑cell monthly subscription on a 24–36 month term, with hardware, software, monitoring, and support included. Exact pricing and ROI are built around your line during the walkthrough.
07 · Hygiene & compliance

Built around food‑plant constraints from day one.

The team behind Merista has designed, deployed, and operated robotics in food‑production environments before. For Merista, hygienic design, cleaning validation, safety assessment, traceability, and certification planning are part of the architecture from the start.

01
Hygienic design
Food‑contact‑safe materials and surfaces selected for the task envelope.
02
Washdown‑aware architecture
Designed around the cleaning regimes the target line already runs.
03
Cleaning validated with QA
Procedures developed to pass the customer's sanitation sign‑off.
04
Safety by design
Risk assessment and CE conformity planning built into the cell architecture.
05
Traceability
Every portion and QA check intended to be logged from deposit through inline inspection.
06
Certification accuracy
Public wording will match actual status at launch — certified, designed‑to‑standard, or planned.
Compliance posture: we state what is certified as certified, what is designed‑to‑standard as designed‑to‑standard, and what is planned as planned. European launch wording is aligned with the current Machinery Directive and the transition to the EU Machinery Regulation. QA leads verify this language.
08 · Design partners

We are selecting our first design partners.

The right first partners run high‑volume chilled prepared‑meal lines, feel real pressure on repetitive portioning seats, and want an automation partner that will work inside the realities of production, QA, cleaning, and payback.

Who is a fit FIT

  • +Prepared meals, salads, bowls, trays, ready meals, and similar chilled lines.
  • +High‑wage markets where repetitive labor economics are severe.
  • +Two‑ or three‑shift lines preferred.
  • +Repetitive portioning, topping, or dosing tasks with measurable pain.

Who is not a fit yet NOT YET

  • Fully irregular artisanal placement.
  • Highly fragile or unvalidated ingredients.
  • Full‑line automation requests before the portioning wedge is proven.
  • Low‑volume, single‑shift lines with weak payback.

What design partners get

01
A line walkthrough and ROI model based on your actual process.
02
Ingredient and task‑envelope assessment.
03
Early access to the first Merista deployment program.
04
Direct collaboration with the founding engineering team.
05
A clear go / no‑go recommendation before committing deeper.
09 · Vision

Portioning is the start, not the destination.

Food production is moving toward systems that run with more consistency, more traceability, and less dependence on hard‑to‑fill repetitive work.

Merista starts where the work is most repetitive and the payback is clearest: portioning and assembly. From there, one task at a time, we help food factories move toward production that is increasingly autonomous from farm to fork.

We are building that with a small number of factories that want to lead. If that is you, we should talk.

10 · The ask

Show us one line. We will tell you honestly whether a cell can pay back.

A walkthrough is exactly that: we learn your process, look at the repetitive work, and give you a straight read on the automation case. No pitch theater, no obligation.

From the team that ran autonomous food production at REMY Robotics 99.9% successful order completion · <1% human intervention · <15 min mean recovery · 15,000 operating hours across 10 sites in 5 cities.
Request a walkthrough ~ 2 min · 4 fields
Or grab a time directly.

Thanks. We will be in touch to find a time that works around your production schedule.

Book a line walkthrough